Colorado High Asset DivorceIndependent lawyer research

Prepublication research edition · August 17, 2026

The financial stakes are the case.

An evidence-led evaluation of Colorado divorce lawyers for business owners, executives, physicians, investors, and spouses facing a substantial marital estate.

Review the rankings Audit the 100-point method

Research preview: Six initial selections have passed the official Colorado public-status gate. Public launch remains on hold for lawyer fact-check, corrections-channel testing, and Colorado ethics and media-law review. The custom domain is not connected.

What “maximize” means here

The best lawful, risk-adjusted economic result—after taxes, fees, expert costs, delay, liquidity, collectability, enforceability, business disruption, and the client’s own priorities.

It does not mean litigating every issue. Spending $300,000 to fight over $200,000 is not financial strength. It is arithmetic with a billing problem.

Initial Colorado selections

A ranking with receipts.

Scores measure the strength of the public evidence for this narrow purpose—not human worth, universal competence, compatibility, or predicted dollars. Profiles were reviewed August 17, 2026 under Methodology v1.0.

Scores within two points are treated as tied because the record does not justify fake precision. Tied lawyers receive the same rank and appear alphabetically; the next ordinal is skipped.

Read the consumer warning
RankLawyerOfficeScoreConfidence
1Kimberly R. WilloughbyGenesee / Golden and Aspen92.5High
2Suzanne GriffithsLone Tree / Denver metro89.5High
2Kathleen A. HoganDenver89.0High
4Megan M. SherrDenver84.0Moderate
4Rajesh “Raj” KukrejaDenver83.5Moderate
6Halleh T. OmidiDenver78.5Moderate
Rank 192.5/ 100High confidence

Genesee / Golden and Aspen

Kimberly R. Willoughby

Willoughby & Associates

The strongest current public record at the intersection of financially complex divorce, trusts, marital agreements, business valuation, and estate planning consequences.

  • Trust interests
  • Business valuation
  • Separate property
  • Marital agreements
  • ERISA and retirement
  • Tax-sensitive division

Limitation / publication check

The public record does not establish a repeatable dollar outcome, current availability, or her personal role in every matter described by the firm. Those questions require direct investigation.

Colorado license and public discipline check

OARC’s public attorney search reported Active and displayed no public disciplinary history in Colorado on August 17, 2026. Registration no. 24847.

This describes the official public display only. It is not a certification about private, nonpublic, sealed, or out-of-state matters.
Open official record ↗
Audit the score
Complex-divorce concentration15.0 / 15
Financial sophistication12.0 / 12
Complex issue breadth11.5 / 12
Advocacy and resolution12.5 / 14
Leadership and scholarship8.0 / 8
Meaningful application and results8.0 / 12
Expert coordination7.0 / 8
License and public discipline6.0 / 6
First-party transparency5.0 / 5
Efficiency and judgment7.5 / 8
Direct profile
Rank 289.5/ 100High confidence

Lone Tree / Denver metro

Suzanne Griffiths

Griffiths Law PC

Four decades of complex financial divorce work, with unusually specific public evidence on trusts, tax, goodwill, restricted stock, financial settlements, and appellate advocacy.

  • Complex settlements
  • Trusts
  • Tax consequences
  • Goodwill
  • Restricted stock
  • Trial and appeal

Limitation / publication check

Publicly advertised large-dollar matter claims were excluded because independent corroboration and client authority were not located. The score rests on the more supportable record.

Colorado license and public discipline check

OARC’s public attorney search reported Active and displayed no public disciplinary history in Colorado on August 17, 2026. Registration no. 24149.

This describes the official public display only. It is not a certification about private, nonpublic, sealed, or out-of-state matters.
Open official record ↗
Audit the score
Complex-divorce concentration14.5 / 15
Financial sophistication11.5 / 12
Complex issue breadth10.5 / 12
Advocacy and resolution12.5 / 14
Leadership and scholarship7.5 / 8
Meaningful application and results8.0 / 12
Expert coordination6.5 / 8
License and public discipline6.0 / 6
First-party transparency4.5 / 5
Efficiency and judgment8.0 / 8
Direct profile
Rank 289.0/ 100High confidence

Denver

Kathleen A. Hogan

Hogan Omidi PC

A family-law-only practice combining business valuation, private equity, family trusts, stock compensation, trial and appellate work, and an exceptional Colorado scholarship record.

  • Business valuation
  • Private equity
  • Family trusts
  • Stock compensation
  • High-income support
  • Trial and appeal

Limitation / publication check

No current individual Chambers High Net Worth ranking was located. Several practice-depth propositions come from detailed first-party materials and should be tested in consultation.

Colorado license and public discipline check

OARC’s public attorney search reported Active and displayed no public disciplinary history in Colorado on August 17, 2026. Registration no. 19131.

This describes the official public display only. It is not a certification about private, nonpublic, sealed, or out-of-state matters.
Open official record ↗
Audit the score
Complex-divorce concentration15.0 / 15
Financial sophistication11.0 / 12
Complex issue breadth10.5 / 12
Advocacy and resolution12.5 / 14
Leadership and scholarship8.0 / 8
Meaningful application and results8.0 / 12
Expert coordination6.5 / 8
License and public discipline6.0 / 6
First-party transparency4.5 / 5
Efficiency and judgment7.0 / 8
Direct profile
Rank 484.0/ 100Moderate confidence

Denver

Megan M. Sherr

Sherr Puttmann Akins Lamb PC

A strong combination of complex financial and trust work, separate-property analysis, marital agreements, trial readiness, and credible independent recognition.

  • Trusts
  • Separate property
  • Marital agreements
  • Complex motions
  • Expert evidence
  • Settlement options

Limitation / publication check

The public record contains fewer attributable financial appellate matters and technical publications than the upper tier. Detailed valuation, tax, and executive-compensation depth should be confirmed.

Colorado license and public discipline check

OARC’s public attorney search reported Active and displayed no public disciplinary history in Colorado on August 17, 2026. Registration no. 31650.

This describes the official public display only. It is not a certification about private, nonpublic, sealed, or out-of-state matters.
Open official record ↗
Audit the score
Complex-divorce concentration14.5 / 15
Financial sophistication10.0 / 12
Complex issue breadth9.0 / 12
Advocacy and resolution12.0 / 14
Leadership and scholarship7.0 / 8
Meaningful application and results7.0 / 12
Expert coordination6.5 / 8
License and public discipline6.0 / 6
First-party transparency5.0 / 5
Efficiency and judgment7.0 / 8
Direct profile
Rank 483.5/ 100Moderate confidence

Denver

Rajesh “Raj” Kukreja

Kukreja McFarlane Law LLC

An especially current fit for private-company, real-estate, trust, executive-compensation, marital-agreement, tax, and maintenance issues, with trial and relationship-preserving judgment both in view.

  • Private companies
  • Private equity
  • Real estate
  • Trust interests
  • Executive compensation
  • Marital agreements

Limitation / publication check

A recent firm transition leaves stale affiliations elsewhere online. Publicly attributable opinions and technical publications are thinner than for higher-scoring selections; firm result claims were not treated as verified outcomes.

Colorado license and public discipline check

OARC’s public attorney search reported Active and displayed no public disciplinary history in Colorado on August 17, 2026. Registration no. 26137.

This describes the official public display only. It is not a certification about private, nonpublic, sealed, or out-of-state matters.
Open official record ↗
Audit the score
Complex-divorce concentration14.0 / 15
Financial sophistication10.5 / 12
Complex issue breadth10.0 / 12
Advocacy and resolution12.0 / 14
Leadership and scholarship5.5 / 8
Meaningful application and results6.5 / 12
Expert coordination6.5 / 8
License and public discipline6.0 / 6
First-party transparency5.0 / 5
Efficiency and judgment7.5 / 8
Direct profile
Rank 678.5/ 100Moderate confidence

Denver

Halleh T. Omidi

Hogan Omidi PC

A compelling complex-divorce litigator with unusually relevant teaching on financial evidence, expert use, income, premarital agreements, trial advocacy, and creative resolution.

  • Financial evidence
  • Expert witnesses
  • Income analysis
  • Marital agreements
  • Trial advocacy
  • Appeals

Limitation / publication check

She has less tenure and less independently documented large-estate, business-valuation, and matter-level result evidence than the higher tier. No individual Chambers High Net Worth profile was located.

Colorado license and public discipline check

OARC’s public attorney search reported Active and displayed no public disciplinary history in Colorado on August 17, 2026. Registration no. 43648.

This describes the official public display only. It is not a certification about private, nonpublic, sealed, or out-of-state matters.
Open official record ↗
Audit the score
Complex-divorce concentration14.0 / 15
Financial sophistication8.5 / 12
Complex issue breadth8.5 / 12
Advocacy and resolution11.5 / 14
Leadership and scholarship8.0 / 8
Meaningful application and results6.0 / 12
Expert coordination5.5 / 8
License and public discipline6.0 / 6
First-party transparency4.5 / 5
Efficiency and judgment6.0 / 8
Direct profile

Consumer warning

A rank is a starting point. It is not due diligence.

These selections are good-faith editorial judgments based on the stated method and public information reviewed on the date shown. They are not certifications, predictions, guarantees, or objective declarations that any lawyer is universally “the best.” A score does not estimate how much money a lawyer will obtain.

Before hiring, independently verify current Colorado status and public discipline, experience, availability, fees, team, conflicts, strategy, and suitability. Colorado does not certify lawyers as specialists in this field; this site does not certify lawyers either.

Candidates requiring verification

Strong evidence. No public rank yet.

These lawyers cleared the research threshold but have an unresolved eligibility or material-claim check. The method does not award them a public rank merely because the site would look tidier with ten names.

Denver

Jordan M. Fox

Taft

Exceptional fit: engineering background, complex trusts, private equity, cross-disciplinary teams, AAML leadership, and official appellate attribution.

Required before ranking

Capture the individual OARC record and independently test firm-reported matter descriptions before assigning a public score.

Direct profile ↗

Boulder / mountain communities

Todd A. Stahly

Stahly Miner LLC

Strong exact fit involving closely held businesses, trusts, family partnerships, startups, mineral interests, forensic accountants, and cost-benefit analysis.

Required before ranking

Capture the individual OARC record, reconcile current firm and office information, and corroborate matter-level financial work.

Direct profile ↗

Denver

Marte B. Timmers

Taft

Highly specific public claims concerning $5 million-plus estates, trusts, closely held companies, private equity, tax, former judicial service, and flexible settlement.

Required before ranking

Capture the official OARC record and reconcile differing firm descriptions of maximum matter size before using any number.

Direct profile ↗

Denver

Kristi Anderson Wells

Wells Family Law

A rare tax, benefits, and executive-compensation foundation with deep public writing on stock rights, retirement, trusts, and complex financial divorce.

Required before ranking

Capture the individual OARC record and add independent matter-level corroboration before assigning a public rank.

Direct profile ↗

Edwards and Denver

Amy M. Goscha

Kalamaya | Goscha

Family-law concentration, trusts, valuation and discovery teaching, and a sustained technical education record with accountants and valuation professionals.

Required before ranking

Capture the official OARC record, confirm the principal office and intake route, and treat the firm’s estate-size claim as marketing unless corroborated.

Direct profile ↗

Colorado Springs

Jennifer L. Helland

Helland & Hurwitz Attorneys at Law

The strongest Colorado Springs candidate located for executive compensation, closely held businesses, professional practices, investment entities, and military retirement.

Required before ranking

Capture the official OARC record and confirm current firm details, direct intake, and the claimed national valuation-expert network.

Direct profile ↗

Methodology v1.0

Evidence first. Marketing claims last.

Official records, reported decisions, substantive publications, actual CLE programs, and transparent professional records carry the most weight. Awards, reviews, search rank, and claims of “aggression” do not earn standalone points.

15Complex-divorce concentrationCurrent Colorado focus, repetition, and substantial-estate fit
12Financial sophisticationStatements, structures, cash flow, valuation, tax, liquidity
12Complex issue breadthTwelve separately scored financial modules
14Advocacy and resolutionTrial, appeal, discovery, experts, negotiation, mediation
08Leadership and scholarshipSubstantive teaching, publications, and relevant leadership
12Application and resultsVerifiable roles, outcomes, legal contributions, and context
08Expert coordinationForensic, valuation, tax, trust, planning, and other specialists
06License and public disciplineOfficial current Colorado public record
05First-party transparencyCurrent profile, office, contact path, substantive resources
08Efficiency and judgmentProportionality, net result, settlement sense, candid risk
100Total possible

How evidence is weighted

The source has to prove the proposition.

A firm website can reliably establish a current phone number. It cannot, by saying so, prove that its lawyer gets uniquely superior results. The tier follows the claim, not merely the website.

A

Primary and official

Registration and disciplinary records, reported opinions, court filings, authored substantive publications, and actual CLE records. Full support when proposition-specific.

B

Independent and institutional

Credible professional organizations, institutional records, and reputable reporting with identified facts. Usually up to 80% from one source.

C

Detailed first-party

Lawyer biographies, firm pages, questionnaires, press releases, and direct lawyer confirmation. Performance or result claims are ordinarily capped at 50% support.

D

Discovery only

Opaque awards, generic directories, paid listings, anonymous reviews, SEO pages, copied press releases, and unsourced superlatives. No standalone points.

Publication floor

At least 70/100; concentration at least 9/15; combined financial depth at least 14/24; advocacy at least 7/14; all eligibility gates passed; no unresolved material claim.

License gate

The official Colorado record must show the lawyer as active. Public discipline is assessed by nature, recency, recurrence, harm, sanction, rehabilitation, and relevance—not reduced to a context-free checkbox.

Anti-double-counting

A source may support distinct propositions. The same article cannot become three separate pieces of proof that a lawyer produced a superior client outcome.

Complex issue breadth

Twelve financial modules. One point each.

  1. 01Business and professional-practice valuation
  2. 02Tracing, commingling, and separate property
  3. 03Hidden assets and forensic discovery
  4. 04Trusts and estate-planning structures
  5. 05Executive compensation, options, and deferred pay
  6. 06Carried interests, private equity, and partnerships
  7. 07Real-estate portfolios and closely held entities
  8. 08Retirement assets and QDROs
  9. 09Premarital and postmarital agreements
  10. 10Tax consequences and net-of-tax division
  11. 11Maintenance, lifestyle, cash flow, and normalized income
  12. 12Debt, liquidity, collectability, and enforcement

The consultation test

Questions that reveal judgment.

Expertise should become legible in the first serious conversation. Listen for concrete sequencing, tradeoffs, ownership of the work, and a willingness to tell you when a fight is economically stupid.

  1. 01

    Which three financial issues in my estate are most likely to change the net result?

  2. 02

    Who will analyze tax, valuation, tracing, and liquidity—and when do you bring each expert in?

  3. 03

    What would make you recommend settlement, targeted litigation, or a full evidentiary hearing?

  4. 04

    How will you prevent discovery costs from outrunning the value of the disputed issue?

  5. 05

    Who will actually handle the financial analysis, depositions, expert preparation, and trial?

  6. 06

    What is your experience with this judge, forum, opposing counsel, and the type of asset at issue?

  7. 07

    How do you evaluate a proposal after tax, fees, delay, enforceability, and business disruption?

  8. 08

    What facts about my case would make you decline it or advise a strategy I may not enjoy hearing?

Editorial policies

Independence has operating rules.

A disclosure is not a permission slip for a compromised ranking. The launch model is deliberately boring: no money, gifts, leads, referrals, or influence from ranked firms.

01

Ownership and conflicts

Colorado High Asset Divorce is owned and published by David J. Pigott, a Colorado lawyer and managing partner of Pigott Law Group. Pigott Law Group and its lawyers are ineligible. Material personal, professional, adversarial, referral, or financial relationships require disclosure and independent scoring; without independent review, the lawyer is ineligible.

02

Inclusion cannot be purchased

The publisher accepts no listing fees, ranking fees, referral fees, affiliate commissions, advertising payments, gifts, free services, reciprocal referrals, or other benefits from evaluated lawyers or firms. No one may pay to improve a score, position, profile, link, or editorial description.

03

No matching or lead sales

This is an editorial publication, not a referral or matching service. It does not screen conflicts, negotiate fees, transmit legal inquiries, or receive compensation when a visitor contacts or hires a lawyer. Profile links go directly to the lawyer’s or firm’s website.

04

Human and automated research

Automated tools, including artificial intelligence, may locate, organize, and compare public sources. They do not make final selections. A named human editor must review the sources, resolve factual questions, approve every score, and accept responsibility for the published judgment.

05

Corrections and removals

A lawyer, firm, reader, or affected person may identify the challenged statement, propose a correction, and provide sources. Requests are ordinarily acknowledged in five business days and reviewed in fifteen. Current-license and materially false-result concerns receive immediate review. Material corrections are dated and explained.

Prelaunch check: activate and test corrections@coloradohighassetdivorce.com before connecting the custom domain. Do not send confidential or time-sensitive legal facts.

06

Removal standard

A profile may be removed for inactive status, departure from relevant practice, failure of the current threshold, unreliable verification, a material unresolved accuracy issue, legitimate privacy or safety concerns, or legal necessity. No person has a right to inclusion, a score, or a veto. No payment, NDA, referral arrangement, or non-disparagement promise is accepted.

07

Advertising rule

The launch edition carries no advertising. If advertising is ever accepted, it must be visually separated, clearly labeled next to affected content, and have no effect on eligibility, score, rank, profile treatment, or links. Paid ranked placement will not be offered.

08

Privacy and data minimization

The preview contains no intake forms, advertising pixels, lead capture, or publisher- controlled analytics. It does not sell or share visitor data. The hosting provider may process routine technical data under its own terms. Visitors should never submit divorce facts, financial records, or confidential information to this publication.

Editorial framework reviewed against:

Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct ↗FTC organizational endorsements and paid rankings ↗Colorado official attorney search ↗Colorado Privacy Act guidance ↗

Legal and consumer disclaimer

Information, not representation.

Colorado High Asset Divorce is an informational editorial publication. It is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice or representation, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Viewing this site, following an external link, or sending an editorial message does not make any listed lawyer or the publisher your lawyer.

Rankings and profiles are based on public information available on the review date. Information may be incomplete, disputed, confidential, or later changed. Omission is not a finding that a lawyer is unqualified. Inclusion is not a guarantee of competence, availability, compatibility, performance, or result.

The publisher does not warrant the accuracy or continued availability of external sites. Nothing here predicts or guarantees any division of property, maintenance award, settlement, judgment, fee, cost, or financial outcome.